← Free risk checker
LIMITED RISK — Article 50 transparency required
Deadline: 2 August 2026. Article 50 has NOT been deferred by the Digital Omnibus. You need a disclosure on your Grammarly chatbot before this date. Fine for non-compliance: up to €15M or 3% of turnover.

Grammarly EU AI Act Compliance: What Businesses Need to Know for 2026

Grammarly helps teams write better — grammar, clarity, tone, and now full AI text generation. For most business use, the EU AI Act obligations are minimal. But there is one scenario where Article 50(2) kicks in.

Mostly minimal: Grammarly used for writing assistance (corrections, suggestions) is minimal risk. Grammarly generative AI used to draft customer-facing communications that are sent without human review may trigger Article 50(2) labelling. AI literacy applies to all AI tool use.

What you need to do — step by step

  1. Identify whether Grammarly generative AI features are used to draft content sent directly to customers, without human review
  2. If so, establish a policy: AI-drafted customer communications should be reviewed and edited by a human before sending
  3. For content marketing: set a threshold for when AI-generated drafts require an "AI-assisted" disclosure when published externally
  4. Update your data processing documentation to reflect Grammarly processing business communications through AI infrastructure
  5. Ensure staff understand Grammarly AI suggestions require human judgement — AI literacy training under Article 4
  6. Review Grammarly Business's data processing agreement to confirm EU data handling

Ready-to-use disclosure text for Grammarly

Copy one of these into your Grammarly bot's opening message:

This message was drafted with AI writing assistance and reviewed by our team.
AI-assisted writing. Reviewed and sent by [Name].
This content was generated with AI support and edited by a human author.

Need this in French, German, Spanish, Dutch, Polish, Italian?

The Chatbot Compliance Pack includes 7 language variants, a T&C clause template, a privacy policy AI section, and the Article 50(2) machine-readable marking guide.

Get Chatbot Compliance Pack — €49 →
Or use the free disclosure generator →

Grammarly and the EU AI Act: full analysis

Writing assistance vs. generative AI: different risk profiles

Grammarly started as a grammar and style checker — an AI that assists human writers rather than replacing them. This use case is minimal risk under the EU AI Act: the human remains the author, the AI improves their output, and no deceptive AI interaction takes place. Article 50 does not apply (no chatbot), and no Annex III high-risk classification applies for standard writing assistance.

Grammarly now includes generative AI features — full paragraph and email generation from prompts. When these generative features are used to draft communications sent directly to customers (automated email campaigns, support replies, marketing copy) without human review, Article 50(2) labelling obligations may apply if the content is "intended to inform, entertain, or persuade."

The practical line for most businesses

For most teams, Grammarly is used by human employees who accept or reject suggestions and maintain authorship of their writing. This workflow does not trigger Article 50(2) because a human is the effective author — the AI assists rather than generates. The EU AI Act does not require you to label every email that benefited from spell-check or grammar suggestions.

The line is crossed when: (1) AI generates the full text, and (2) that text is sent to recipients without meaningful human edit. Automated outreach campaigns powered by Grammarly generative AI with no human in the loop would require disclosure.

Data protection is the bigger concern

For most Grammarly Business users, the more pressing concern is data protection, not EU AI Act compliance. Grammarly processes all text entered into its browser extension and API through its own servers and AI infrastructure. If employees use Grammarly on emails containing customer personal data, contracts, or confidential business information, your GDPR data processing documentation needs to account for Grammarly as a sub-processor. Review your DPA with Grammarly and update Article 30 records accordingly.

Frequently asked questions

Does Grammarly fall under the EU AI Act?
Grammarly as a writing assistance tool is minimal risk under the EU AI Act for standard use. It does not function as a chatbot (no Article 50(1)), and writing correction assistance does not fall under any Annex III high-risk category. The main consideration is Article 50(2): if Grammarly generative AI drafts content published to customers without human review, that content may need an AI label.
Do we need to tell customers that AI helped write our emails?
Not for emails where a human author used Grammarly to improve their own writing. Article 50(2) targets AI-generated content specifically intended to inform, entertain, or persuade. A human-authored email improved by Grammarly grammar suggestions is not "AI-generated content." Emails entirely written by Grammarly generative AI and sent automatically without human review are in a different category.
Is Grammarly Business GDPR-compliant for EU business data?
Grammarly has a Data Processing Addendum (DPA) and processes data in accordance with GDPR. However, your compliance team should ensure: (1) Grammarly is listed as a sub-processor in your GDPR records, (2) your Grammarly Business subscription tier's data handling policies cover your use case, (3) employees are not inputting special category data (health, financial, legal) into Grammarly without appropriate data governance.
Does Article 4 AI literacy apply to Grammarly users?
Yes. Article 4 requires that organisations using AI tools ensure staff have sufficient AI literacy. For Grammarly, this means employees understand that AI suggestions are not always correct, that AI-generated text requires review for accuracy and tone, and that AI assistance does not replace professional judgement in high-stakes communications.