Crisp AI features and the EU AI Act: full analysis
Which Crisp features fall under Article 50
Crisp offers two distinct AI feature types with different compliance implications. First, the Crisp Chatbot with AI responses — this interacts directly with website visitors and clearly falls under Article 50(1). A disclosure at the start of each conversation is required. Second, MagicReply — this is an agent-assist tool that suggests replies for human agents to send. When a human agent reviews and sends the suggestion, it is not an AI system "directly interacting" with the user in the Article 50 sense. If MagicReply is configured to auto-send without agent review, Article 50 fully applies.
Crisp is popular with SMEs across the EU
Crisp has strong adoption among European startups and SMBs — many of whom are directly in scope of the EU AI Act as both providers and deployers. If your company is based in the EU and uses Crisp to interact with customers, you have Article 50 obligations as a deployer, and if you build products with Crisp's API that include AI interactions, potentially as a provider too.
Disclosure placement in Crisp
The most reliable approach is a dedicated first-message step in your chatbot scenario flow. Crisp's scenario builder allows you to set a "Send message" block at position one before any condition or routing logic. This ensures every visitor who opens the chat widget and triggers a bot interaction sees the disclosure. Do not rely on the chat widget title or a footer note — the regulation requires the disclosure to be "clear and distinguishable."